Document Type : Review
Authors
1 Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
3 Department of Microbiology and Virology, School of Medicine, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
4 Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5 Department of Microbiology and Virology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is a common cause of death due to infectious diseases across the world. According to the report of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017, approximately 10 million new cases of Mtb infection have been recorded, including 5.8 million males, 3.2 million females, and one million children, among which 464,633 cases have been reported to be simultaneously infected with HIV-1.
The emergence and spread of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) bacterial strains have increased the concerns regarding the treatment and control of TB, so that until 2017, 558,000 cases of resistance to rifampin were recorded, 82% of which were afflicted with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) (1-4). In addition, approximately a quarter of the world’s population has been reported to be infected with latent TB, while only 5-10% are affected with active TB. Due to the inefficiency of the current TB vaccination, which is known as the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, in the prevention and complete immunization against active TB and TB re-activation in adults, it could be stated that the eradication of TB is not possible (1, 5-7).
Literature review
Mtb effectively employs several strategies to escape the immune system. Therefore, the key to battling TB would be to consider and investigate the molecular mechanisms that may complicate the pathogenesis of Mtb (8).
Mtb is spread through the infected droplets that are generated by sneezing and coughing of TB-infected individuals. Upon arrival, the bacterium is detected by the alveolar macrophages and other innate immune cells. The final outcome of the disease varies depending on the interactions between Mtb and conditions of the host; the main outcomes could be classified as primary aborted TB infection, active TB, latent TB infection (LTBI), and re-activation of latent TB.
Cellular immune responses play a key role against TB. For instance, shift to the Th1 response and production of IFN-γ leads to the phagocytosis and degradation of TB bacilli (i.e., tubercle bacillus). On the other hand, switching to Th1/Th17 leads to LTBI. Moreover, shifts toward Th2/Th22 lead to the production of interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-4, IL-13, and CTLA-4, thereby causing the impairment of the cellular immune system and TB re-activation (5-8). Co-infection with HIV and destruction of CD4+T cells (Th1) are also considered to be important risk factors for the re-activation of LTBI (9).
An elementary and effective Mtb mechanism for the prevention of degradation is the containment of the formation of intracellular phagosome-lysosome fusion. Additionally, tubercle bacillus remains hydrolyzed in phagocytosis cells by inhibiting the acidification of phagolysosomes through restraining the H+-ATPase pump, as well as the inhibition of phagosome maturation through blocking the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Vps34 pathway (10). Interestingly, many of these mechanisms are associated with the autophagy process, especially the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P) and PI3K-hVps34 signaling pathways. Therefore, it seems that the autophagy process may be involved in the pathogenesis of Mtb (11).
Autophagy is considered to be an important intracellular mechanism for the degradation and reprocessing of macromolecules, as well as damaged and worn-out organelles. During the process, part of the cell cytoplasm is enclosed within an exclusive vacuole, which is known as autophagosome, and is ultimately fused with a lysosome to be decomposed. Approximately 30 genes regulate the autophagy process in yeasts, among which 16 homologous genes have been identified in the human genome as well (12, 13).
Autophagy is one of the mechanisms of programmed cell death, which occurs in order to maintain normal homeostasis, cellular starvation, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) supply, aging, stress response, and cancer and infectious particles in eukaryotic cells (14). In general, three elements are involved in the autophagy process, including autophagy-related genes (Atgs), autophagosome vesicles interacting with organelles (e.g., mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi apparatus), and lysosomes (15). The most prominent ATGs include ULK1 (Atg1), Beclin-1 (Atg6), PI3PK, hvP34, p62, NBR1, NDP52, LC3 (Atg8; containing the LC3I solution and LC3II lipid form and expressed in three isoforms of LC3A, LC3B, and LC3C), GABARAP, GABARAPL1, and GABARAPL2. LC3II is considered to be the most important autophagy marker, which is produced through the action of Atg3 from LC3I (12, 16). In addition, Beclin-1 and Atg5 play a key role in the regulation of signaling pathways and formation of autophagosomes, while p62 and NDP52 are often expressed as autophagy receptors in the cell cytoplasm (16).
Several factors affect the regulation of the autophagy pathway, including the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), reactive oxygen species (ROS) response, microbial antigens, cytokines, TAB2/3-TAK1-IKK signaling pathway, and pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as toll-like receptors, RIG-l-like receptors, NOD-like receptors, and microRNAs (14, 17).
As a defensive strategy in innate immunity, autophagy deals with various intracellular pathogens, such as Mtb. During infections, bacterial antigens are identified by a specific group of PRRs known as sequestosome-like receptors, which are introduced and bound to the LC3 proteins after ubiquitin tagging through adapter proteins, such as NRB1, p62, and NDP52. Afterwards, LC3 acts as a carrier, integrating autophagosomes into lysosomes (fusion). As a result, the TB bacilli are degraded by lysozyme hydrolyzes (Figure 1) (18).
According to the literature, the autophagy process is induced and enhanced owing to the degradation of latent TB bacilli in macrophages after isoniazid and pyrazinamide treatment, leading to the release of Mtb antigens and response to ROS and NADPH oxidase (19). In a study in this regard, Gutier et al. demonstrated that the starvation of Mtb-infected macrophages and simultaneous rapamycin treatment increased the interactions between Mtb, Beclin-1, and LC3, thereby inducing autophagy. Furthermore, the mentioned study indicated that IFN-γ could improve the clearance of Mtb from the body via the immunity-related GTPase family M protein 1 signaling pathway through stimulating autophagy (20). Moreover, ATP, damage-associated molecular patterns, vitamin D, and ROS could stimulate and increase autophagy, while IL-1β, IL-10, mycobacterial cell wall compounds (especially phosphatidylinositol ManLAM, ESAT-6, and CFP-10) could restrain and dysregulate autophagy (21).
Based on the mentioned molecular mechanisms, autophagy is considered to be one of the most basic and principal mechanism to eliminate TB bacilli. Recent studies have shown that autophagy enhances the presentation of Mtb antigens by the MHCI and MHC II molecules, further stimulating cellular immunity against TB. Therefore, rapid elimination of TB bacilli through the autophagy mechanism could inhibit overactive cell-mediated immune responses, ultimately preventing tissue destruction, formation, and expansion (22).
It is speculated that provoking autophagy pathways is an effective anti-TB strategy, which may lead to the development of anti-TB drugs with a new mode of action. In this regard, findings have demonstrated that rapamycin and pyrazinamide treatment could enhance the autophagy pathway (22, 23). In addition, the administration of the antipsychotic drugs that increase and stimulate calcium pumps and metformin through the activation of AMPKs (mTOR inhibitors) could ultimately stimulate and increase autophagy, thereby improving TB control (Table 1) (23, 24). Some of the proteins belonging to the autophagy pathway (especially p62) are also known as neo-antimicrobial peptides owing to their central role against TB and could be synthesized and commercialized as pharmaceutical compounds (25).
Conclusion
Considering the emergence of high-resistance bacterial strains against common antibiotics and ineffectiveness of TB vaccines (e.g., BCG) in the prevention and treatment of the disease, eradication of TB does not seem to be possible. Therefore, the emphasis lays on the prevention of TB, and the use of immunity-based methods has been highlighted in this regard. Cellular immune responses play a pivotal role against TB, such as the shift to the Th1 response and production of IFN-γ, which leads to the phagocytosis and degradation of Mtb or switching to Th1/Th17, which results in LTBI. Furthermore, the shifts toward Th2/Th22 lead to the production of IL-10, IL-4, IL-13, and CTLA-4, causing the impairment of the cellular immune system and TB re-activation. Interestingly, several of these mechanisms (particularly the signaling pathways of PI3P and PI3K-hVps34) are associated with autophagy development.
Autophagy is an innate immune defense mechanism, which deals with intracellular pathogens such as Mtb. At some stage during infections, bacterial antigens are identified by a specific group of PRRs, and after ubiquitin tagging, they are bound to LC3 proteins through adapter proteins such as NRB1, p62, and NDP52. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that provoking the autophagy pathways is a prominent anti-TB strategy, which may enhance anti-TB drugs with a novel mode of action.
Acknowledgements
Hereby, we extend our gratitude to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and Jiroft University of Medical Sciences for assisting us in this research project. The authors received no funds for this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.