Nazanin-Zeinab Hajmolarezaee; Mohammadhossein Taherynejad; Hassan Mehrad-Majd; Ali Moradi; Yalda Ravanshad; Amirreza Rostami; Salman Farsi; Sara Movahed; Sahar Ravanshad
Abstract
BackgroundLow back pain is a common reason for disability in patients younger than 45 years old who visit physicians. Although there are many attitudes toward treating back pain, there is no commonly accepted approach. This study compared various attitudes toward the examination, diagnosis, and treatment ...
Read More
BackgroundLow back pain is a common reason for disability in patients younger than 45 years old who visit physicians. Although there are many attitudes toward treating back pain, there is no commonly accepted approach. This study compared various attitudes toward the examination, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic low back pain among neurologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic surgeons. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, a checklist including four main aspects of history taking, clinical and para-clinical tests, and treatment of chronic low back pain was designed to be completed by 45 specialists (orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and neurologists). Results Straight Leg Raising (SLR) was the most frequent test during the examination process. The high priorities among the para-clinics were MRI, lumbosacral graph, EMG-NCV, serology lab test, and CT scan, respectively. A significant difference was found in requesting lumbosacral graph among specialties. Moreover, the priorities for nonsurgical treatment were NSAIDs, nonpharmaceutical treatment, muscle relaxants, gabapentin, and corticosteroids, respectively. ConclusionHistory taking, physical examination, diagnostic approaches, and treatments were significantly different among the different specialties. The results revealed the need for consensus on common and well-established guidelines for a clinical approach to chronic low back pain.
Maryam Hami; Mehrdad Sarabi; Mehdi Hassanzade Daloee; Hassan Mehrad-Majd; Abdollah Firoozi; Niloofar Nourizadeh; Niloofar Nikpasand; Sara Naghizadeh Kashani; Mina AkbariRad
Abstract
Background and aim: Cardiac arrhythmia is common in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, especially those undergoing hemodialysis. One of the most significant risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias is thought to be electrolytic abnormalities. This study aimed to assess the effect of hemodialysis on ...
Read More
Background and aim: Cardiac arrhythmia is common in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, especially those undergoing hemodialysis. One of the most significant risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias is thought to be electrolytic abnormalities. This study aimed to assess the effect of hemodialysis on cardiac arrhythmias according to electrolytic disorders in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on ESRD patients who had undergone hemodialysis for at least six months. An electrocardiogram (ECG) and serum levels of sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium were checked before and after hemodialysis for all the patients. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS software.Results: In this study, 96 patients were included. The most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (AF) (22.9%). Our findings revealed that changes in serum potassium levels (p = 0.036) had a significant relationship with the occurrence of AF. There was a significant negative relationship between changes in serum calcium level and the QTc interval (r = -0.223 and p = 0.023). Furthermore, there was a significant positive relationship between changes in serum calcium levels and the QRS complex amplitude (r = 0.350 and p = 0.0001).Conclusion: ECG abnormalities, especially AF arrhythmias, are common in patients undergoing hemodialysis, which highlights the need for ECG monitoring both during and after hemodialysis.